Article written by Lauredhel

Lauredhel is an Australian woman and mother with a disability. She blogs about social justice, reproductive justice, freedom from violence, the use and misuse of language, medical science, being disabled, her garden, and whatever else pops into her head.

Lauredhel also blogs at FWD/Forward (feminists with disabilities), scribbles at her personal dreamwidth journal Selective and Arbitrary, and co-moderates Hollaback Australia. She joined Hoyden About Town in 2007.

5 responses to ““…it is not strange that men and women who do not recognise the sacredness of marriage should decide to enjoy what they regard as its pleasures without being bound by its contract.””

  1. kristi

    It’s also very sad that they mention what form syphilis will take in young girls, without mentioning that it is a sign of sexual abuse.

  2. Rebekka

    It’s not necessarily a sign of abuse – children can have congenital syphilis passed on from their mother during childbirth, and may not show symptoms for years.

  3. “Thus the disease may be conveyed by promiscuous kissing, the practice of allowing comparative strangers to kiss infants and children being particularly objectionable.” at Hoyden About Town

    [...] here. This instalment, “Syphilis” and “Personal Responsibility”, completes Chapter III: “Outside The Marriage Circle”. [Bold is [...]

  4. kristi

    Sorry, I did mean gonorrhea. But I think that even in the case of syphilis, the sores on the genitals wouldn’t appear if the disease had been contracted in utero.

    If the author had gone on to speculate about whose fault it was that little girls might contract syphilis, I think she probably would have blamed the prostitutes. Would the readers of the book have had any power to stop the men?

Switch to our mobile site