Article written by :: (RSS)

Lauredhel is an Australian woman and mother with a disability. She blogs about disability and accessibility, social and reproductive justice, gender, freedom from violence, the uses and misuses of language, medical science, otters, gardening, and cooking.

This author has written 1549 posts for Hoyden About Town. Read more about Lauredhel »

20 responses to “US Election: 3 days to go, and Palin/”Sarkozy” prank call”

  1. Quixotess

    Ohhhhhhh shit.

    I can totally understand not getting the pop culture names, and even though I sort of feel like she should know the name of the PMs of France and Canada I don’t exactly expect her to cause she don’t know jack about shit (keep cramming, maybe the next four years will catch you up all the way)…

    But some of what he said to her was so bizarre or outright inappropriate! Doesn’t she think that the damn president would have enough sense not to talk about his sex life with someone (especially a prominent female politician!) he’s not even met? And he would be a little less inane than to talk about how “real” she is? And not address her as “Mrs Governor” or “my dear”?

    OMG. Everyone in that room should be fired. Including Palin. But this is just going to make her think, even more, that those plebeians are uppity and rude and against her and she shouldn’t bother listening or even letting them talk to or see her, isn’t it?

    ….But “Marcel, the guy with the bread under his armpit” is seriously gold. <3 that line.

  2. Quixotess

    Incidentally, if you’re a savvy politician with a savvy team, what kind of things happen if you suspect you’re being pranked/how easy is it for people to get access to you like that?

  3. Anna

    Is this for real?

  4. Quixotess

    Anna–yep, it’s been picked up by the MSM and I found a few articles that said her staff confirmed it. Let the spin begin!

    Lauredhal–in your transcript you have “except from my ass you can see Belgium.” Sounded to me like he said “house.”

  5. Bernice

    I listened to this via HuffPo with the 11 yo Tormentor beside me – by the time we got to the Belgium line, he was looking at me open-mouthed, saying “doesn’t she know this is a joke?” …kinda answers the question about inexperience.

    Apart from the sheer reckless arrogance of assuming Sarkozy would just ring up for a chat, it’s her breathless first 45 seconds or so that is horrifying – the guy’s not asking you out on a date for chrissake.

  6. Grendel

    I notice that the clip is no longer up on YouTube – I wonder who took it down.

    When I heard it I thought I head them name a PM of Canada and a PM of Quebec – an obvious trap for the unwary, but did I mis-hear?

  7. Beppie

    I just watched the clip, no worries. Like Lauredhel, I originally thought that it must have been a planned stunt– for me, simply because she was spouting her rehearsed talking points in exactly the same way she has been doing when she knows she’s got a big audience. But I’m also with Quixotess that some of that was highly inappropriate, particularly the bit about Naylin Paylin, which I see as nothing less than sexual harrassment.

    Nonetheless, I agree with everyone that this raises even more doubts about her readiness for office– hopefully any undecides left will see it that way too.

  8. Quixotess

    Persuading undecideds? Maybe, but…well, I looked at a conservative forum discussing this, and some things said:

    1. this is the only thing they have against mccain/palin
    2. dems said they wanted to talk about the issues; how hypocritical ($150,000 wardrobe also mentioned)
    3. palin kept her professionalism and politeness admirably throughout the call
    4. plenty of other famous folks have been pranked before; were they stupid?
    5. those guys were mean and hateful
    6. how is this palin’s fault when her assistant was the one who handled the phone and told her she was speaking to sarkozy?

    So that’s another way to look at it. One I disagree with entirely (except maybe 5), but just…people will see what they want to see.

  9. tigtog

    What it says to me is that she doesn’t have sufficiently professional staff to handle the office that she’s aiming for.

    Can anyone imagine Rupert Murdoch, for instance (I’m listening to him deliver his first Boyer lecture as I type), ever getting pranked like this? His staff would filter it – all it takes is finding out the name of the alleged person and looking up their publicly available contact details.

    I betcha it would take me less than five minutes to find the publicly accessible contact details for Sarkozy, using only English-language websites.

  10. slave2tehtink

    Don’t they have…caller ID? That would show a phone number coming from Montreal and not, y’know, Paris?

    Also correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the impending destruction of Sarkozy’s marriage all over the news not long ago? Bringing his happy beautiful family up is sort of…tactless. And ignorant.

    Ah well. This is appalling on so many levels, really.

  11. Bene

    Some of it’s inappropriate as hell, but at the core, it proves, as Lauredhel pointed out, that there’s massive fail at the Palin office, and the vetting of the Republicans this year is craptacular. That said, if American conservatives are blaming this on the Dems, I laugh.

    Big election stuff here is McCain on Saturday Night Live, though, which was some combination of ‘gee, it’s good he can mock himself’ and ‘wow, this is depressing’.

  12. Helen

    I’m as anti-Palin as anyone else, but my reaction is “Oh, the poor woman. I can’t look any more.” Watching the McCain-Palin campaign has become like rubbernecking at a particularly gory car crash.

    Imagine the conversations at campaign HQ… or rather… don’t. I’m going off to look at some furry otters or something.

  13. Pavlov's Cat

    Yeh, this reflects appallingly on everyone concerned. Like all reasonable people I am horrified by Palin and by what this conversation reveals about her, but (a) I think it could backfire in much the same way as Pauline Hanson’s ‘Please explain?’ moment, and (b) I think this kind of stuff is entrapment pure and simple.

    Calling something like this a ‘prank’ is like insulting someone online and then adding a smiley-face emoticon.

    And I also have zero tolerance for smartarse boys.

  14. M-H

    Whut Dr Cat and Helen said. In spades.

  15. Anna

    I’m irritated whenever someone in politics demonstrates that they don’t know the name of the leader of the country next door. If she can see Russia from her house, she can probably also spot Canada.

    Ah well.

n.b. our posts are closed to new comments after 60 days. If you wish to discuss a closed post, please use the latest open thread.