Article written by :: (RSS)

tigtog (aka Viv) is the founder of this blog. She lives in Sydney, Australia: husband, 2 kids, cat, house, garden, just enough wine-racks and (sigh) far too few bookshelves.

This author has written 3287 posts for Hoyden About Town. Read more about tigtog »

4 responses to “Doctor Who: S7 Ep3 – A Town Called Mercy”

  1. YetAnotherMatt

    When were teabags invented?

  2. ollie

    I actually wrote myself a little blog post about the horse named Susan, as it’s obviously one of the things that stuck out to me! Check it out.

    I liked this episode a lot more than I thought I would – I’m definitely liking the dark doctor stuff. Interesting to see the Doctor with a gun, for example …
  3. quixote

    Oh fercryinoutloud. What are they doing to Doctor Who? Do they plan on doing a segment updating Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals next? Soon we’ll find out the Master is actually the Doctor’s father. Bah. A murrain on them.

  4. Kristin

    I’d call this episode a clumsy exploration of the morality of war. Spoilers ahead . . .

    It was interesting that the question of how to behave morally in a wartime situation was answered very differently by not one, not two, but six characters (cyborg, doctor, mayor, Doctor, mob leader, and Amy).

    So what was clumsy? A lot of the dialogue about war and morality. It’s too complex a topic to be answered with one-liners, which mean the one-liner answers were wrong.

    What else was clumsy – the Doctor being “saved” from killing somebody (although a death occurred anyway) in the episode right after he killed somebody. Conflicting messages here.

    I thought this episode was veering away from the “dark Doctor” crap because Amy stopped him. It repeats the theme of the Doctor needing a companion to remain a good guy.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.