So, Federal Parliament in Australia has gone into the year-end hiatus following the summer sittings. They’ll be back for the autumn sittings in February/March.
For those of us not living in Queensland, antics in Canberra overshadowed some truly extraordinary shenanigans in Brisbane’s state parliament, and now they’ve gone into hiatus until February as well.
In the USA’s 2nd session of the 112th Congress, there’s still two more weeks of scheduled sessions for the HoR before their winter holiday recess. Obviously, the fiscal cliff debates are casting a pall over Washington. The 1st session of the 113th Congress will convene briefly on January 3rd-4th, then return to their constituencies for a week, then return to DC for a 2-week work session bracketing the Presidential inauguration on January 21st.
In the UK, Parliament is in session until December 20th and returns on January 7th. Responses to the Leveson Report are likely to continue to feature prominently, and the child s*x abuse investigations associated with Jimmy Savile are marching on.
Around the world, various other legislative bodies are going into either a short winter or a long summer hiatus over the year-end. The media in countries where the summer recess has already begun can look forward to a break from relentless partisan spin for a good month or more (there’ll still be some rumblings, of course); the media in countries where the winter recess has yet to begin will be lucky to get a quieter week or so between the solstice and the New Year.
Depending on what happens over the next few weeks, this particular Media Circus thread could well see us through until January.
What’s piqued your media interests lately?
As usual for media circus threads, please share your bouquets and brickbats for particular items in the mass media, or highlight cogent analysis elsewhere, on any current sociopolitical issue (the theme of each edition is merely for discussion-starter purposes – all current news items are on topic!).
Detainee condemns ‘slaughterhouse’ Nauru
tigtog @ 1 – It’s such an appalling situation. No doubt like before though that the government will hide behind rules around privacy of detainees to deny the request to do any filming. They don’t want to risk humanising them in the eyes of the public.
There’s an astonishing beat-up in the Terrorgraph, if you haven’t seen it already: ‘Party time’ as PM called a ‘hero’ over asylum-seeker detention policies
This is weird, listening to Alan Jones apologise for his comments re Barbara Ramjan,who is not “some lady from far away places and distant times” (how odd) “but is indeed a woman of distinction”, married to a former supreme court judge no less…. Reminds me of that scene in A Fish Called Wanda where John Cleese is hung by his feet out a window and gives a fulsome apology for any offense…
http://podcasts.mrn.com.au.s3.amazonaws.com/alanjones/201209-ramjan.mp3
Certain elderly members of the U.S. Democrats and Republicans clinging to Congressional leadership well into their seventies and eighties is far too reminiscent of the early 1980s Soviet gerontocracy where no one who hadn’t fought in WWII was considered good enough for a leadership spot so you had the [redacted] position of elderly pensioners on dialysis commanding a superpower.
Well, many many media folk in the UK and around the world will be extremely happy to learn the news that the Duchess of Cambridge really is pregnant at last. That’s their business plan for the next few years sorted out, pretty much.
I object to newspapers trying to tell me how to think – even though it’s much more attuned to my political leanings, I don’t even like it when The Guardian does it. I feel very strongly that a good newspaper should be presenting you with the information to make up your own mind, not pushing their own particular agenda. The Daily Mail masquerades as something more upmarket than the tabloids, but the only real difference is its appearance and an increased word count.
Speaking of the Daily Mail, The New Statesman weighs in with ’11 Surprising Revelations in the Daily Mail’s anti-Leveson hatchet job’. I defy you to get to the end without giggling.
Suzanne Venker’s nostalgia piece is risible.
Heard on the radio this morning
Not to the happy couple, but to the royal sperm provider. FFS.
Also this talk of a ‘wheelchair bound’ woman who interrupted the PM. I complained that unless she was actually tied into the wheelchair they shouldn’t be calling her wheelchair bound.
The whole Kate is pregnant thing is making me feel slightly queasy, in that it’s another reminder that the bodies of pregnant women are widely perceived as public property; this whole effect is dialled up to ten when the pregnant person happens to also be part of the royal family. I’m sure that if I was vomiting my guts up, the LAST thing I’d want is all the international media talking about it — alongside all the “helpful” polls about what she and William should name the baby. Also, if it happens that she loses the pregnancy, she’ll not be allowed to process it privately; she’ll be obliged to engage in public grieving — and unlike other women in the UK, she won’t have the option of terminating the pregnancy on account of her health.
Presuming that all goes well with the pregnancy and also the monarchy continues, Wills & Catherine’s sprog will be the first person who is in the direct line of succession that I am unlikely to see become our monarch.
Mr Denmore at The Failed Estate has taken note of that Terrorgraph article I noted upthread:
Kevin Drum at Mother Jones is currently my go-to for what’s going on in Washington. Drum’s latest looks at whether John Boehner really does have a workable compromise plan for the fiscal cliff or whether he’s just making soothing noises.
@Tom, except for Charles?
@Orlando, I think Tom means that he expects to see Charles and William become monarch, but not this next heir.
Exactly. I mean that I mostly likely won’t be alive when the Prince/Princess fetus becomes King/Queen
I was making a joke about the unlikeliness of Charles ever attaining the hollow crown.
I guess I failed to see it because I can’t see a single reason why he won’t succeed his mother. She comes from long-lived stock, but so does Charles. On a purely statistical basis, and with a few weighting factors given his dedication to an organic healthy life of outdoorsing whenever possible, I’d expect to see him on the throne for at least a decade.
From this article about The Pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum in the West Australian:
What? Be grateful for your constant vomiting because it just shows your body is trying really hard to be pregnant?
Mr Denmore has summed up the year in Australian political media coverage:
Read the whole thing – it’s a corker.