If bare midriffs and short-shorts really made athletes run faster

by tigtog on August 30, 2006

in gender & feminism, sport

then this is what the male sprinters would be wearing.

Yes, we're running faster!

It’s instructive to compare male and female track costumes over the last few decades.
The 1984 Olympics:

1984 Olympic runners

The 2000 Olympics:

2000 Olympics 4x100 relay teams

The August 2006 European Championships:

2006 Euro championships

Strange how the costumes are moving in opposite directions on the short-long axis. At the next Olympics I expect these empowerful women to be running in Sports Corsets.

IBTP.

Similar Posts:

{ 2 trackbacks }

Hoyden About Town
November 13, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Sexualised sports uniforms turning girls off sport — Hoyden About Town
December 24, 2008 at 6:28 pm

{ 4 comments }

1
J August 30, 2006 at 4:15 pm

I figure that everyone, male and female, should be completely nekkid. Sure the kids might have a few questions for mum and dad during the pole vault, but, they have to learn some time.

In all seriousness – the worst case of what you’re talking about came at the last Olympics, where the female volleyball players were compelled to wear uber-sexy sportswear. I’m not sure there’d be a way to justify the necessity for reduced clothing in a sport like volleyball.

2
tigtog August 30, 2006 at 4:42 pm

Yes, that was the beach volleyball so that they got extra risk of sunburn as well!

I think the stadium volleyball girls got a bit more clothing because a hard floor, even if it’s gym-sprung, can be rather more unforgiving graze/scrape-wise than sand.

I just don’t understand why we’ve gone so backwards since 1984 with the hypersexualisation of women.

3
Andrew Warinner September 1, 2006 at 11:05 pm

I have distinct recollections of bun huggers being around since the ’70s. Warsaw Pact female athletes seemed to favor them, at least the sprinters did.

I deplore the lycra longjohn look. Men’s distance runners are holding onto their shorts for the most part, thank god. They all should go back to singlet and shorts. The sprints can wear split shorts if they insist.

Here in Yurp, God-fearing normal running shorts are damn hard to find. I was looking for in the sports store today and all they had were the lyrca tights. Feh.

4
tigtog September 1, 2006 at 11:53 pm

Sure, I wore bun huggers in the 70s but they sat on the lower hip socket crease, not up on the iliac prominence like they do in the Olympics 200 shots, and not such low waistlines that the athlete needs a bikini wax like the 2006 Euro championships shots.

I think both sexes looked sleek and comfortable in 1984 – yay for split shorts etc – so what the fuck is up with today’s fashions?

Comments on this entry are closed. If you wish to re-open this discussion, please leave a comment on the latest Open Thread.

Previous post:

Next post:

  • Random Quote

    What a useful arrangement for men; they have forceful women to undertake the tasks which they find distasteful and have thereby removed women as competitors from tasks that are more to male tastes. But they have gone even further than this for, not only have they failed to pay women for their labour, they have insisted that women undertake these tasks because they want to, because they like it, because it is 'natural' to them. One wonders why it should be 'natural' in woman to do so many disagreeable things. Does the average man really believe that she has an instinctive and unquenchable craving for all the unpleasant and unremunerative jobs?'
    Cicely Hamilton (1872-1952)
  • The Quintessential
    Hoyden About Town


    Emma Peel - Hoyden About Town

    Read more

    Affiliate Program

    How smart is your Theme?  How good is your support? Check out ThesisTheme for WordPress.