I’m surprised that most US blogs I read are still as hung up on the VP debate as they are, but there you go. Reading Michelle Malkin’s liveblogging of the event was an eye-opener though (not linking, google if you must). Talk about a totally different lens.
On with the main event (the next presidential debate is only a day away):
John McCain’s unprecedentedly ugly speech today
from Salon: Glenn Greenwald by Glenn Greenwald – McCain/Palin are pulling out all the bigotry stops now in order to smear Barack Obama.
McCain/Palin lashing out at the media as being to blame for all their campaign problems seems to have finally made some media outlets fall out of love with John McCain: Melissa at Shakesville discusses a story from the LA times which shows that his naval career wasn’t all that glorious.
A new website has been launched about the Keating Five Scandal that was at the heart of the Savings & Loan crisis that torpedoed 1000 US banks in 1987: Keating Economics. The Obama campaign has released a video (13 minutes) to accompany the launch (see it at the site).
McCain jettisons his ‘Maverick’ label: lawyer says Keating Five investigation was a setup
from Pam’s House Blend by Pam Spaulding – Pam righteously mocks the way that Senator Straight Talk can’t even stick to what he was saying six months ago when it comes to the Keating Five Scandal.
The death of GOP electoral tactics on the war
from Salon: Glenn Greenwald by Glenn Greenwald – Glenn shows that conventional wisdom earlier this year, that the war in Iraq would be a winning issue for Republicans, has now been shown by public reaction to the presidential and vice presidential debates to be just as wrongheaded as Glenn said at the time: the voters hate the GOP party line on the war. Check out the diagrams.
Finally, everyone worried about getting out the vote should read this comment by Teresa Nielsen Hayden from a thread at Making Light a while ago, citing instances of voter suppression and more during the Bush administration (follow all the links I’ve reproduced in the quote):
Terry Karney (7):
I heard a piece on NPR about this same thing being done in Virginia. Students who registered to vote with their college address got questionnaires challenging their residence, including the questions about dependent status.
They did indeed do this same thing in Virginia. That’s troubling on two counts.
First, it’s hard to see how the schools could have honestly come up with this erroneous new interpretation they’re peddling to their students. The pertinent tax codes and student financial aid regulations neither suggest nor support the idea that students can’t register to vote where they go to school if they’re listed as dependents on their parents’ tax returns.
Moreover, the rules being misinterpreted are not obscure. They’re some of the core laws pertaining to postsecondary institutions and the students who attend them. There is no way university administrators at major institutions can avoid being familiar with them.
Pause to summarize: it’s hard to see how university administrators could honestly make that mistake.
Second, I find it impossible to believe that the same brand-new misinterpretation could spontaneously arise at two (or more) universities during the same campaign season. This is an interstate conspiracy to deny legitimate voters their right to vote, and it’s originating within the national Republican organization.
Then there’s the foreclosure notice = challenge at the polls, and all the other varieties of general suppression.
It’s a general pattern at the national level, and it’s increasingly blatant. I’ve been writing about it since 2000: the false devaluation of exit polls. The exclusion of legitimate Florida voters from the rolls of registered voters. James Baker‘s bare-faced lie about computer counts being more accurate than hand counts. The attack on the Florida ballot recount by known Republican political operatives from out of state, whose expenses were being paid by the national organization. Numerous instances since then of vote suppression and politically motivated vote caging. The Diebold mess. The Republicans’ use of “voter fraud” as a code phrase for suppressing votes, and their profoundly improper firing of state attorneys general who didn’t adequately respond to White House pressure to pursue vote suppression schemes. (Even scarier: all those state attorneys general who weren’t fired, and are still in place for the 2008 elections.)
That’s not a party; it’s a national-level criminal conspiracy. As ever, I’m boggled by the sheer number of people who don’t understand that a political operation that suppresses voting, doesn’t count ballots, and lies constantly and shamelessly to the public, is not and cannot be on their side.
Categories: culture wars, Politics
Rolling Stone has an even more comprehensive shake-down of McCain’s undistinguished-at-best, appalling-at-worst career from start to finish.
Thanks to my friend, blondeheroine, for linking to it.
MatildaZQs last blog post..The Rock Loves Pie: Alton Brown’s "Super Apple Pie"
Satire and Saturday Night Live must be contributing to both the Palin phenomenon and an increasingly sceptical electorate. Can’t fool all the people…
While I did have a general sense on the ground here in Middle America that the GOP war stance was not cutting it with people, it was heartening to see it confirmed.
More4 in the UK just broadcast the HBO drama Recount about the year 2000 presidential election. Am amazed anyone would trust the Republican party again if the stunts they pulled in this movie were genuine. It’s really gripping to watch if you can get a hold of it and Kevin Spacey is excellent.
Just to comment on the least of these issues: As a rural gal, I’ve been waiting with ‘bated breath for SOMEONE to point out to McCain’t/Failin’ the original meaning of the word “maverick.” As I always understood it, a maverick calf is a stray calf, usually an orphan, who may legally be claimed by the first rancher to rope and brand it.
Naomi Wolf said in the SMH this weekend that dermatologists have said that the survival rate for men of McCain’s age treated for the type of cancer he was treated for (any ideas?) have an average survival of 2-4 years post op (according to actuarial studies). This was the first I had heard of cancer treatment, but it is definitely chilling if true. A Palin presidency probably wouldn’t get a second term, but you could imagine what would happen if McCain did die in office and Palin took over. It would put the cause of women, especially women in politics, back generations.
The article is here. The quoted section is on page 2.
I was going to post the Rolling Stone thing, but I see someone else has beaten me to it
you may enjoy this rant about Palin instead:
a bit too gonzo for its own good, but that seesm to obligatory at RS these days: I don’t think they get a gig if they can’t channel the Duke.
and if you want a laugh at how self-deluding teh rednecks are, try this:
and here’s jon Stewart’s take on the ‘reformed maverick’
Ugh, go and read this:
*headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk*
from Trouble Is A State Of Mind
“Nailin’ Paylin”? Furrfu.
Oh, by the way, did you know that one can make a donation to to Planned Parenthood in SaraPalin’s honor?She gets a nice card at her office in Juneau.
That’s a cause I think I can support… =8-)