A Christian white male junior college student launches into a tirade about feminism, in a stomach-churning expansion of the “Now see what you made me do?” principle.
“What about a pole dancer mother?”
Highlights and translations:
… but the point of this of post is how shocking to me hearing feminism spoken from women’s’ mouths. I expect it from the liberal media from the New Yorker, MSNBC, CNN, my local news paper etc, but to hear it for real just strikes me differently and is just shocking.
“I’ve just met actual embrained women for the first time! Geez, they’re uppity bitches, aren’t they?”
However, with the fall of mankind God placed specific curses on man and to the woman he stated:
3:16 “Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee”.
So from that point on women were on a hierarchal lower position than man in the world, which I believe has given the fact that “Its a man’s world.” Women do not have a lesser nature and have equal rights to God’s love, forgiveness and grace but as the Father has a position of authority of the rest of the Trinity the husband has the position of authority over women and they have suffered because of this curse. And as my wife points out, this is what happens when women chose another thing to be there God.
“I can only feel like a big person by enslaving others. Oh, and I’m a malignant pillock who can barely string a sentence together.”
Getting back to the extreme which feminism in America has achieved its understandable why the anti-feminist movement has come to be. Feminism in its blind desire of “freedom” has received it but not known what it would do with it, at least nothing more than abortions, divorce, spousal abuse and pornography (visual in strip dancing or physical in prostitution). Yet all of these things are not forums of freedom but enslavement and self hatred. Freedom for the sake of freedom is dangerous.
“See what you did to yourselves, women? You raped yourselves, abused yourselves, beat yourselves, objectified and degraded yourselves, and fucked yourselves. If only you’d’ve listened to men in the first place this never would have happened to you. Suck it.”
Choice is placed over the sacredness of the woman’s body so you have women who see themselves merely as sex toys and honestly not people.
“We only kick you around because you like it. There’s no way for you to be an actual human; your choices are sex toy or subjugated wife. Suck it some more.”
Nevertheless, I am thankful that we’re not going to be discussing such hot topics as abortion and homosexuality as they always opens up a can of worms with lots of vitriol.
“I’m a wounded special snowflake; no one ever listens to my world-shattering insights about the natural, ordained place of women as serfs. Watch me weep.”
In comments, “matthew” prods the blogger:
Are you sure you don’t want to debate abortion and homosexuality?
and he replies:
I’d talk about those topics but I don’t believe people could handle it. Everyone so quickly gets offended and hurt as if I’m attacking them personally. I’d do if they’d allow me to drink in class. lol! Couple glasses of wine I think would do everyone quite some good.
“I’m a dangerous creep who can barely keep my driving need for domination restrained in public. Don’t get me drunk, you could get hurt. Oh, and those damn harridans oughtta loosen up.”
Just in case you forgot for a moment just how much they really do hate you.
Categories: culture wars, gender & feminism, Politics, social justice, violence
Hoyden About Town 
Yup, when you start talking about homosexuality people do have the nerve to ‘take it personally’, but only because you’re telling me that some of my friends ought to be legally discriminated against on the grounds of who they fell in love with or who they choose to have casual sex with (or that they choose to have casual sex at all).
Those wacky queers, taking it ‘personally’ when all you want to do is tell them who they’re allowed to marry and why they make unfit parents! The nerve.
but I was just shocked at the stupidity of feminism.
I’m just shocked at the level of written English (and general education and critical thinking) that seems to pass in the US education system.
That’s all.
Apart from the idiocies mentioned above (esp the sub literate use of language)isn’t it facinating that everytime his circular argument starts to head back up its own fundement, he invokes his whitebread, mid west version of christian inanity. Odd that.
I’d like to hear from his obedient wife.
I’m glad I wasn’t the only one to notice the atrocious attempt at grammar in this piece of tripe. Basically, when anyone is going along trying to make an “intelligent” point about feminism or women’s roles, and they just revert back to bible scripture it seems to me a very lame attempt to contribute anything new to the overall argument. And kudos to him for actually invoking Dr. Laura as someone feminists should look up to, very brave sir.
And finally, I enjoyed how he referred to a Burqa as a “dress”, as if its just another garment a woman pulled out of her closet. Something tells me that most Islamic women who are forced (or choose) to wear burqas don’t routinely decide to take a leisurely dip at the lake, what with the high risk of becoming entangled in yards of fabric and drowning.
Ah, it is good to see my blog makes people mad. Thank you for your *kind* dissemination of this article by my friend J.
A few things you may need to know though before you continue on this current tack:
J does indeed find it hard, in the heat of passion, to put all his sentences together quite as well as he would if he were submitting a paper for his class. I do like to recommend he have his brilliant wife edit them, but apparently she didn’t have time for this one, as she is likely busy running the business she’s taken over from his mother while he finishes up a bit of school.
J is no stranger to intelligent and strong women, he married one of the brightest people I know (note I said people, not women, compared to most MEN I know she’s still far and away above them in intelligence and good-ol’ common sense).
A sad fact about current culture is its inability to step away from its opinions: taking everything personally creates a dangerous climate in which real debate becomes personal effrontery and intense combat. How can we air the truly hard issues surrounding any current topic if at the first sign of someone taking it personally, we must back off?
If the homosexual ideology is not ALLOWED to stand against debate and honest criticism by those who support it, how can we tell if it might actually be superior, truly?
All that to say, if you read carefully J’s words, I believe you will find that he said nothing such as you have “interpreted” him to have said. Instead, the ideas you put in his mouth are the result of filtering arguments which you should address to support the validity of your own ideology through your own preconceived ideas of what “his ilk” ought to be and do.
On a linguistic note, it’s good to see words like ‘uppity’ being used, and the double apostrophe? I love you for it. I’ve been trying to pioneer words like I’ven’t, he’dn’t’ve and needn’t’ve for years!
But as for the blatant misogyny, does anyone seriously listen to such ridiculously old-world arguments like “God made woman man’s slave” anymore? I mean really, stuff like this is dangerously close to satire.
I’m a big fan of using exactly the required number apostrophes, and no more. And ‘uppity’ is a perfectly cromulent adjective.
You’re completely right, of course, they satirise themselves. Sometimes it’s fun to play, though.
As an aside (and not to you, Jangari), commenters should note that any hate speech may well be transfigurated into a cute baby animal.
Lauredhel,
May I please inquire if anything in particular in the comments here approached “hate speech”?
What’s the “homosexual ideology,” and who said it was superior to anything?
Did I miss a memo? Maybe it’s detailed in the Homesexual Agenda (TM), but since my copy of that seems to have gotten lost in the mail too, I guess I’ll never know.
An Ideology is a set of ideas on which a culture or community is based. It is almost never agreed explicitly upon by the members of that culture, but is always tacitly approved by those members.
You don’t need to have a signed copy of the Declaration Of The Homosexual Ideology to subscribe to it. If you participate openly or clandestinely in that culture, you accept, to a greater or lesser extent, the homosexual ideology.
If you participate in any given community or culture, you state by action (which is more substantive than stating by word) that you believe the ideology of that culture or community is superior for you. If you are a relativist, you stop there. What is better for you may not be better for others. Therefore you can say you do not see one ideology being superior to another.
But the existence of mutually exclusive ideologies puts the lie to relativism. Therefore the need for debate over the strengths and weaknesses of any given ideology. This is not personal, it’s only thoughts and ideas. But ideas do have import and effect.
Heh. I confess I stepped over the puddles of ordure and went straight for the translation. “Cromulent”? I’ll have to look that one up.
It’s a bit like the word “gullible”, su – you won’t find it in the dictionary.
I suppose the “hadn’t’ve” is one step up from the could of, had of, should of which has suddenly burst like a dreadful fungoid excrescence on our society (I s’pose I should watch out for the hyperbole, myself 🙂 )
J does indeed find it hard, in the heat of passion, to put all his sentences together quite as well as he would if he were submitting a paper for his class. I do like to recommend he have his brilliant wife edit them, but apparently she didn’t have time for this one, as she is likely busy running the business she’s taken over from his mother while he finishes up a bit of school.
Was this a deliberate joke, or do you really not see the irony in that, Matthew?
It was in the Urban Dictionary though. Dang I don’t watch enough Simpsons to keep up. I really like fungoid excrescence, Helen.
I knew there was some connection between the proliferation of apostrophes and tribbles. An article about Star Trek Insurrection talked about the large number of apostrophised names in the screenplay- Ba’ku etc. Aha! Using my advanced skills of retrograde twisted logic I predict that the apostrophe population will continue to soar before collapsing utterly. Alternatively we may have to lay baits.
We don’t need to ‘debate’ the ‘homosexual ideology’ because no one is trying to convert anybody to homosexuality, so it doesn’t matter if one way of life is ‘superior’ to another. The issue is whether or not you have the right to impose your view on others, whether the government has the right to restrict the civil liberties of some people but not others, and whether some relationships ought to be privileged under law. Generally, in a democracy it is assumed that the government only has the right to control and restrict individual choice where those choices disadvantage other individuals or the community.
It makes no difference to the community who I live with, who I raise my kid with, or who I sleep with, and I’m required to continue paying taxes at the same rate regardless of my personal relationships or my gender, so I vehemently oppose any continuation of or return to discrimination against me on the grounds of those relationships or gender. Perhaps all those who are so desperate to discriminate on religious grounds might take a moment to consider that they are protected, by law, in their pursuit of religion. Which is entirely different from imposing it on all of us.
If he is so blind as to accept, and then spout, the biblical drivel, by definition he is not fit to inhabit the same Universe. Just like those awful feminazis & homesexualists and greenies and communists and .. and..
On behalf of women everywhere, thank you for this.. compliment, is it, Matthew?
“he married one of the brightest people I know (note I said people, not women, compared to most MEN I know she’s still far and away above them in intelligence and good-ol’ common sense).”
This is what happens when men choose GOD over EDUCATION. Or rational thinking, for that matter.
Oh, isn’t it much easier to read the bible instead of actually coming up with an idea or two by yourself?