Article written by Lauredhel

Lauredhel is an Australian woman and mother with a disability. She blogs about social justice, reproductive justice, freedom from violence, the use and misuse of language, medical science, being disabled, her garden, and whatever else pops into her head.

Lauredhel also blogs at FWD/Forward (feminists with disabilities), scribbles at her personal dreamwidth journal Selective and Arbitrary, and co-moderates Hollaback Australia. She joined Hoyden About Town in 2007.

20 responses to “More outrage over sex ed for youngsters: The Hormone Factory”

  1. blue milk

    Scary to see what kind of innocuous information is still capable of scaring certain parents.

  2. Liam

    Good lord that site’s ugly.
    I’m quite amazed that someone’s found a way to make factual depictions of sex into something so eye-wateringly unpleasant.

  3. Mindy

    Any parent who objects to that site might find themselves a grandparent much sooner than they anticipated. I know by the time I was in year 12, there were girls in year 7 who were sexually active. There were probably girls in my year 7 as well, who just kept very quiet. I think yr 7 is a good time to start talking about the nitty gritty of sex ed. My son was told in kindergarten that his ‘privates’ were his own and no one should touch them except him (or maybe a doctor if mum or dad are there). Unfortunately he came home with the idea that this meant that privates were ‘dirty’ and shouldn’t be seen which was news to his little sister who loves running around nudie. She thought it was hilarious to make him yell ‘no, put it away, I don’t want to see your bottom’. We have now established that privates are your own, but walking around nudie, if you want to, is not dirty.

  4. hexy

    Good lord, did they let a Year 7 kid DESIGN that site? It’s horrible!

    I was year-seven-aged when I had my naivety about sex rather forcefully removed from me.

    hexy’s last blog post..Viva la révolution de fourmi!

  5. Deborah

    I think yr 7 is a good time to start talking about the nitty gritty of sex ed.

    Yes… ‘though I’ve started with my year 5 daughter (aged 10, for non-Aussies) – started last year, in fact. And I’ve been slow on details so far. I try very hard to give her enough information, but not to overload her, so that she has time to process it. And I always end wth, come and ask me about anything you like.

    Last week she asked me to explain rape. That was a tough one.

    Deborah’s last blog post..Adventures in aetheist parenting

  6. Kirstente

    The parents objecting to this seem to be completely ignorant of the fact that kids talk to each other about sex – denying them sex education won’t keep them ‘innocent’. But it might prevent them getting things completely wrong.

    (For several years I believed that women had to go to hospital once a month for their periods.)

    Kirstente’s last blog post..On normalcy fetishism.

  7. Grumphy

    The site comments on Brisbanetimes.com.au were at least reassuring, last I checked (mid yesterday). Just about all of them were making similar points to you (“ignorance isn’t innocence, just dangerous”; “hot dang, I’ll be examining this site with my kids ASAP”, “fundies need to STFU” etc*). Given that BTimes isn’t exactly a hotbed of liberal thought (CityKat, ewwwwwww), my manufactured controversy-sense is tingling. Which really gives me the irrits; its not like there isn’t real news out there being consistently ignored by the crew at fairfax.

    I’m chuffed that the website exists, but yet again I feel let down that state-approved educational resources are so… crappy. We needed a local and tween-appropriate alternative to stuff like scarleteen. Is it too much to ask that it won’t actually break the interwebs with its crap design?

    *also, “hurf durf they didn’t convert inches to centimeters properly”, which did make me laugh.

  8. hexy

    The parents objecting to this seem to be completely ignorant of the fact that kids talk to each other about sex – denying them sex education won’t keep them ‘innocent’.

    Oh, yes. As “That Weird Bookish Kid”, I was answering a lot of questions posed by girls who otherwise ostracised me by Year 5 or 6.

    hexy’s last blog post..Word usage that annoys/amuses me… with SCIENCE!

  9. Renee

    Oh for crying out loud the hysteria regarding sex education is ridiculous. Why can people not realize that leaving children in ignorance leads to things like unplanned pregnancy and the spread of STD’s. I would think fear of the aforementioned would be enough for people to get over the desire to deny the sexual side of our nature. I have gone over this information with my 8 year old and nothing on this site would be new to him. I would much rather him be informed than end up an early grandmother or finding out that he has AIDS. Sexuality is part of life and we just need to get over the desire to moralize it.

    Renee’s last blog post..Mad World: Adam Lambert

  10. orlando

    “sex bits”?

  11. Helen

    Just posted this comment on Sattler’s thread – probably won’t get past moderation. My comments on the Tele rarely do.

    Whatever your views are on abortion and sex education, it is clear that the site is geared to trigger its audience’s interest in the subject.

    Well, der. Kids of ten and up (sometimes even younger) are pretty curious about sex, and it’s this kind of material which tries to give out accurate information to counteract the Chinese Whispers and furphies that they will encounter in the schoolyard. If you’re worried about kids being curious about sex younger, instead of criticising this site, you might consider criticising the soft porn, “Longer Lasting Sex!” and other crap we’re forced to view on billboards, public transport ads and TV ads.

  12. The site may be ugly, but the content is amazingly good. I’m rather liking it. It definitely could use some easier navigation, but it IS the sort of clunky design a kid could create.

  13. Helen

    Heh – just checked back and they have published it – and so far there’s not one comment on there agreeing with Sattler!

  14. A couple of interesting articles: whither Web Design? — Hoyden About Town

    [...] links strike me as topical given the response to the Queensland sex education website: quite a few of us hated the look of the site. But are we looking at it through old media [...]

  15. tigtog

    Yay – well done Helen.

  16. katarina

    Helen, thank for this:
    “If you’re worried about kids being curious about sex younger, instead of criticising this site, you might consider criticising the soft porn, “Longer Lasting Sex!” and other crap we’re forced to view on billboards, public transport ads and TV ads.”
    It can’t be repeated often enough.

  17. Megan

    In the “What do you think?” section:
    “How do you use a tampon? I agree / I disagree / I don’t know”

    Roughly half the questions are phrased in a way that makes the first two invalid answers. Am I missing something?

  18. kez

    I think the site is way too simple. I would have found it patronising when I was in grade 7, and what’ with the ‘sex bits’? Even my 3yo knows the proper words.

  19. lauredhel

    I’m on the fence about its simpleness. On the other side, it’s worth considering that the site isn’t aimed at children in families where they were taught proper anatomical names in toddlerhood.

Switch to our mobile site