Article written by :: (RSS)

tigtog (aka Viv) is the founder of this blog. She lives in Sydney, Australia: husband, 2 kids, cat, house, garden, just enough wine-racks and (sigh) far too few bookshelves.

This author has written 3457 posts for Hoyden About Town. Read more about tigtog »

3 responses to “I don’t think that means what you think it means: Margaret Court edition”

  1. D.

    I was going to go “When did Margaret Court become a conservative evangelical minister?” but Margaret Court fell off U.S. tennis fans’ radar by the ’80s (in fact, I had forgotten she was Australian), so really anytime between then and now probably.

    I am often puzzled by athletes being conservative in later life.

  2. tigtog

    I am often puzzled by athletes being conservative in later life.

    I’m not – I’d expect the ratio of various political viewpoints to align moderately well with the variances in the general population. Elite athletic competition is all-consuming, so we as viewers rarely get much of a sense of other aspects of an athlete’s life, because they simply don’t have time to do much else while they’re in training for championships, so I can see why any one individual’s later life views might come as a surprise, but statistically speaking I can’t think of any particular reason for elite athletes to be slanted more towards progressive than conservative.

    Back to the post – this reminds me of Andrew Bolt last year acidly asking voluble protestors outside the court “Can I have my freedom to speak now?” when he had microphones being held up to him by journalists and they didn’t. Having the right to speak as one wishes doesn’t mean that other people’s right to keep talking at the same time gets taken away. I just wish those protestors had started chanting SPEECH IS FREE FOR BOTH YOU AND ME at him.

  3. Megpie71

    Her husband, Barrymore Court, was the son of Sir Charles Court (and is the older brother of Richard Court). Sir Charles Court was Premier of Western Australia between 1974 and 1982, while Richard Court was Premier of Western Australia between 1993 and 2001. The Courts are basically the big name political family in the WA Liberal Party scene.

    (Explanation for folks from outside Australia: the Liberal Party of Australia is our major conservative political party. Sir Robert Menzies got the difficult concepts out of the way in the party name).

    Quite honestly, I’m not surprised by Mrs Court’s conservatism. She’s of an age, and from an era, where becoming a full-time tournament tennis player was an aspiration only open to the privileged. She married into a highly privileged political family. Given her age, her background, her history and her religious faith (all of which can be garnered from her Wikipedia page) I’d be more surprised if she’d turned out to be a left-wing feminist!

    Back to the topic of the post – didn’t she already voice her opinion on this matter, repeatedly? I hardly think anyone attempted to stop her – even if a number of people did say that in their opinion, the way she phrased it was a bit over-the-top. She’s not being stopped from speaking out now – and she’s perfectly welcome to have her say in any medium she chooses. It’s just that she can’t force the rest of us to listen, and she can’t force anyone to agree with her position. Which isn’t censorship – it’s democracy in its purest form.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.